通信人家园

 找回密码
 注册

只需一步,快速开始

短信验证,便捷登录

搜索

军衔等级:

  一级通信军士

注册:2009-5-11
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2010-1-15 15:33:30 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
下面是我公司卖的新产品的资料片段,CDMA2000中正在推广使用,国外技术,新拿到个技术文档,由于做通信不长自己翻怕不准确,就想请通信高手们帮我专业的翻译下!
TMAs vs GMAs: The Link Budget
»To determine if uplink enhancement is required a link budget is used.
»The link budget determines the balance between the uplink and downlink paths.
»TMAs may have better performance for taller towers (higher main line loss) but is there enough downlink in the link budget to support greater than 3 dBuplink imbalance?
»Use GMAs (SuperLink 830) if the link budget requires 3 dBor less on the uplink regardless of the tower height.
»Use SuperLink 830 if there is any near band transmitters that can create IMDsregardless of tower height.

GMAs vs. TMAs
GMAs competitive advantages over TMAs:
»Competitive performance delivered
»No tower climbs
  »Multiple specialized resources needed to install and maintain equipment
  »Quicker installation
»Less down time to repair
  »TMAs may take 3 or 4 days before they can be replaced: result is significant degrade to cell site
»No tower loading
»Superior lightening protection
»Visible installation quality
»Unmatched reliability
»No recurring lease costs if any
Simplified operations result in OP EX dollars saved

举报本楼

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

版规|手机版|C114 ( 沪ICP备12002291号-1 )|联系我们 |网站地图  

GMT+8, 2025-7-18 01:51 , Processed in 0.100384 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Copyright © 1999-2025 C114 All Rights Reserved

Discuz Licensed

回顶部